HealthKit vs Google Fit in React Native: One Took 3 Hours, the Other 3 Days

HealthKit on React Native is straightforward. Google Fit is mid-deprecation; Health Connect is the real Android target. Real timing data from shipping a fitness app.

Compare/HealthKit vs Google Fit in React Native: One Took 3 Hours, the Other 3 Days

Comparison

HealthKit vs Google Fit in React Native: One Took 3 Hours, the Other 3 Days

HealthKit vs Google Fit on React Native — what the docs hide and what actually takes 3 days to debug.

Short answer

HealthKit (iOS) is mature, well-documented, and the libraries just work. Google Fit (Android) is in a long deprecation transition to Health Connect. If you are starting today, you wire HealthKit on iOS and Health Connect on Android — not Google Fit.

I learned this the hard way shipping a fitness app in March 2026.

HealthKit on React Native

What works

  • react-native-health covers most read APIs (steps, heart rate, workouts, sleep, weight).
  • Permissions flow follows Apple''s pattern — single sheet, granular per data type.
  • Background updates via observers and enableBackgroundDelivery.
  • Apple''s privacy enforcement is strict but predictable.

What hurts

  • iOS-only. Pretending it solves Android too is the trap.
  • Apple Watch data requires extra entitlements and an actual Watch app for some data types.
  • The NSHealthShareUsageDescription and NSHealthUpdateUsageDescription strings must be specific or App Review will reject.

Time to first working read

  • HealthKit (steps + heart rate): about 3 hours, including App Store privacy declarations.

Google Fit / Health Connect on React Native

The transition

Google deprecated the Google Fit API. Android 14+ uses Health Connect as the unified store. New apps should target Health Connect. Old Google Fit code still works on older devices but is on borrowed time.

What works

  • react-native-health-connect is the active library to target.
  • Conceptually similar to HealthKit — permission grants per data type, async reads.
  • Once permissions are granted, reads are reliable.

What hurts

  • Documentation is thinner than HealthKit''s. Stack Overflow will not save you.
  • Health Connect is opt-in for many users — if they have not installed/enabled it, your reads return empty.
  • Permission UI varies by Android version. Test on at least Android 13 and 14.
  • Background reads are more constrained than HealthKit''s observer pattern.

Time to first working read

  • Health Connect (steps + heart rate): about 3 days, mostly spent on permission UX and emulator setup.

What you actually need to ship a cross-platform fitness app

  • HealthKit on iOS via react-native-health (or an Expo equivalent).
  • Health Connect on Android via react-native-health-connect.
  • A thin abstraction layer in your code so the rest of the app does not care which platform it is on.
  • Privacy strings done right on iOS. App Review will sit on you otherwise.
  • A clear UX flow when permissions are denied — both platforms hide the re-grant deep in settings.

My default

Build the iOS path first with HealthKit. Validate the product. Then port to Android with Health Connect. The reverse order will burn a week of runway on permission edge cases.

What AI App Factory ships

See pricing · Build a fitness app with AI

Skip the debate. Ship the app.

AI App Factory gives you a proven stack. React Native + NestJS + Supabase + 11 AI agents. One-time purchase.

AI App FactoryCompareHealthKit vs Google Fit in React Native: One Took 3 Hours, the Other 3 Days