EAS Build vs Fastlane: I Ditched Fastlane After 2 Years. Here's Why.
Fastlane served me for 2 years. Then EAS cut my build time by 70% and killed credential hell. Real numbers inside.
Fastlane served me for 2 years. Then EAS cut my build time by 70% and killed credential hell. Real numbers inside.
Comparison
I used Fastlane for 2 years before switching to EAS Build. 70% faster builds, zero credential management. Here's the full comparison.
Short answer: EAS Build
EAS Build for every new project. Fastlane only if you are stuck in an older bare React Native project that already depends on it, or if your CI budget is zero and you have a spare weekend.
The reason is not that Fastlane is bad. It is that EAS Build has closed the gap and removed most of the setup pain.
.p12 files, no manual provisioning profiles.eas submit uploads to App Store Connect and Play Console from the same command.eas.json are declarative.eas secret:create.expo-dev-client + custom hooks).For a solo dev or a small team, the $29/month is cheaper than your time.
EAS Build. For every new project. The time I save on signing alone pays the monthly fee.
EAS Build profiles (dev, preview, production) preconfigured in eas.json. eas submit wired for both stores. Secrets slot documented. You run two commands and you have a production build.
Free tier gives 30 builds/month. Production plan ($99/mo) gives unlimited builds on Medium resource class plus priority queue. Fastlane is open source and always free but you pay in CI minutes on your own runners (GitHub Actions, CircleCI) plus the engineering time to maintain the pipeline.
My typical Expo + React Native app: EAS Build = 8-12 min on Medium resource class. Same app on Fastlane + GitHub Actions = 25-35 min after Xcode download, cocoapods install, code signing, and asset processing. EAS wins because they pre-cache the iOS simulator and Xcode layers.
Yes but EAS Submit covers 95% of cases now (TestFlight upload, Play Store internal track, metadata sync). The only cases where you still need Fastlane are custom signing workflows, enterprise distribution, or compliance-mandated build environments.
Yes. The bare workflow works with EAS Build as long as you have a valid ios/ and android/ directory. You lose some Expo-specific niceties but the core build performance is the same.
Bolt.new vs Lovable: Which AI Builder Actually Ships? (2026)
Both Bolt.new and Lovable generate web apps fast. Neither ships native mobile apps. Honest comparison from someone who tested both and built an alternative.
Cursor vs Claude Code: Editor vs Terminal Agent (2026)
Cursor is an AI-first IDE. Claude Code is an agent that runs in your terminal. After 6 months on both, here is when each one wins for shipping real apps.
Expo Push vs Firebase: I Switched After 10,000 Notifications Failed
Expo Push works until it doesn't. Here's the scale limit I hit and which one my 4 shipped apps use now.
Expo vs Bare React Native: Which Should You Choose? (2026)
Expo ~54 vs bare React Native in 2026. I shipped with both. Expo wins for 90% of apps now. Here's the honest breakdown from production experience.
Shippen gives you a proven stack. React Native + NestJS + Supabase + 17 AI agents. One-time purchase.